Library

Extension of Response for Cane Sugar Anti-Dumping Case

Extension of Response for Foreign Manufacturers and Exporters and Domestic Manufacturers and Importers for Cane Sugar Anti-Dumping Case(Case No. AC02.AD13-AS01)

On September 21st, 2021, the Ministry of Industry and Trade issued Decision No. 2171/QD-BCT on investigating the application of measures to prevent evasion of anti-dumping measures to a number of cane sugar products originating from Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia and Myanmar.

On October 25th, 2021, Department of Trade Remedies (Investigating Agency) announced on the issuance of the Investigation Questionnaire for Foreign Manufacturers and Exporters and Domestic Manufacturers and Importers (Case No. AC02.AD13-AS01).

During the process of receiving the Investigation Questionnaire, the Investigating Authority received requests to extend the time for answering the Investigation Questionnaire from the relevant parties. Therefore, on November 23rd, 2021, the Investigating Agency issued the announcement on agree to the extension. The Investigating Authority requires all relevant parties to cooperate and participate sufficiently during the investigation. The extent of the response will be the basis for the Investigating Authority to review and draw a conclusion of the investigation of this case. In the event that the Investigating Authority does not receive timely responses from relevant parties or the information provided is incorrect or incomplete, the Investigating Authority will use information and documents provided by related parties, the information and documents collected by the Investigating Authority or available information and documents for giving the result according to the regulation of Law on Foreign trade management.

The relevant parties must respond directly to Investigation Authority before 15:00 on December 16th, 2021 (Hanoi time).

The information, data provided in the Questionnaire of the Investigation Authority and the right to access the information of the case during the investigating term will be implemented in the regulations of the laws.

If Client needs any more information or request for legal advice or potential dispute regarding trade remedies measures including, anti-dumping, countervailing duty and safeguard measures or international trade dispute matters, our competition, anti-dumping, and countervailing duty lawyers of International trade and tax practice at ANT Lawyers, a law firm in Vietnam always follow up anti-dumping cases and their development to update clients on regular basis.

How ANT Lawyers Could Help Your Business in Vietnam?

You could learn more about ANT Lawyers International Trade and Tax Practice or contact our International trade dispute lawyers in Vietnam for advice via email ant@antlawyers.vn or call our office at (+84) 24 730 86 529

Tuan Nguyen

Recent Posts

Construction Practicing Certificate in Vietnam: 7 Issues Foreign Engineers Should Check Before Supervision and Acceptance

A construction practicing certificate in Vietnam is not only a personal qualification paper.  Many foreign…

3 days ago

Anti-Dumping Investigation on Solar Glass from Vietnam: 7 Checks for Exporters

Turkey has opened an anti-dumping investigation on solar glass from Vietnam, China, and Malaysia. The…

6 days ago

How to Obtain a Construction Practicing Certificate in Vietnam: 10 Steps for Foreign Engineers

Foreign engineers, construction managers, designers, supervision consultants, and cost managers working on construction projects in…

1 week ago

Turkey Anti-Dumping Investigation on Polyester Tire Cord Fabric from Vietnam: 4 Risks Exporters Should Know

On June 16, 2026, Turkey opened an anti-dumping investigation on polyester tire cord fabric from…

1 week ago

Work Permit for Foreign Engineers in Vietnam: 7 Issues Foreign Contractors Should Plan Before Mobilization

A work permit for foreign engineers in Vietnam is not just a matter for the…

2 weeks ago

Evidence in Arbitration in Vietnam: 7 Problems Foreign Companies Often Underestimate

A company can be commercially right and still present a weak arbitration case. In evidence…

2 weeks ago

This website uses cookies.