Library

When a Contract is Invalid Due to Non-compliance with Form?

Generally, contracts for sale and purchase of goods and service contract shall be expressed in verbal or written form or established with specific acts. For types of contract which must be made in writing provided by law, such contract must comply with such form regulation. Particularly, contract for international purchase and sale of goods shall be conducted on the basis of written contracts or other forms of equal legal validity.

There are two cases of non-compliance with form: (i) form of contract is not in accordance with the law and; (ii) contract violates against regulations on notarizing or authorization. It should be noted that the form of contract shall be the conditions for its effectiveness in cases where it is provided by law. The time limit of requiring the court to declare a contract of non-compliance with form invalid is 02 years, from the establishment date of contract. After such time limit, if there is still no request for declaring contract invalid, such contract still remains valid.

When the contract is invalid, the general rule is restoring everything to its original state and returning to each other what have received. The non-compliance with form contract could be valid de facto contract if recognized by the Court’s decision when one party or the parties has fulfill at least two third of the obligation contract. Obligations means work whereby one or more entities must transfer objects, rights, pay money or provide valuable papers, perform or not perform certain work for the interests of one or more other entities. However, one party or the parties fulfilling at least two third of the obligation contract will not naturally make such contract valid unless there is decision of the the Court to recognize such. Specifically, according to request of one party, after fully considering conditions mentioned above, the Court shall make a decision on recognizing the validity of such contract.

It is important for parties to have a proper contract with terms and conditions that provide sufficient details with consideration of the nature of the business transactions and the possible resolution when potential disputes arise.  Further, the law governing the contract and the dispute resolution clause which refers to court or arbitration choice should be as clear as possible to avoid confusion and extended time resolving the arisen disputes.

How ANT Lawyers Could Help Your Business?

Contact Us for ADR & Mediation Services provided by qualified mediators and arbitration lawyers in Vietnam, supported by field experts via email ant@antlawyers.vn or call our office at (+84) 24 730 86 529

Tuan Nguyen

Recent Posts

Vietnam Resolution No. 66.23/2026/NQ-CP: New Beneficial Ownership Standards for AML Compliance

The Vietnamese Government has issued Resolution No. 66.23/2026/NQ-CP, dated July 24, 2026, introducing temporary special…

4 days ago

Vietnam Steps Up Prevention of Illegal Child Labor: Decision 1415/QĐ-TTg and What Export Factories Should Check

On July 28, 2026, the Prime Minister issued Decision 1415/QĐ-TTg, which approves the National Program…

4 days ago

Construction Payment Dispute in Vietnam: 7 Issues Foreign Contractors Should Address When Payment Is Refused or Withheld

A construction payment dispute in Vietnam often becomes visible when a contractor submits a progress…

6 days ago

Vietnam Anti-dumping Investigation on Prestressed Steel Bars from China – AD24: What Interested Parties Should Know

On July 27, 2026, The Vietnam Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT) issued Decision No.…

6 days ago

EPC Contract Review in Vietnam: 9 Clauses Foreign Contractors Should Check Before Signing

EPC contract review in Vietnam should happen before the foreign contractor signs, mobilizes people, or…

1 week ago

Malaysia Anti-dumping Investigation on Aluminium Zinc Coated Steel from Vietnam

Malaysia has opened an anti-dumping investigation on aluminium zinc coated steel products originating in or…

1 week ago

This website uses cookies.